Something for Everyone: 'CIGNA Corp. v. Amara'

Chadbourne’s Edward P. Smith examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s CIGNA
Corp. v. Amara decision, which both clarified and muddied the ERISA
issue of the remedies available in the event of a conflict between the
terms of a plan document and the information provided to employees in a
summary plan description.

By |2011-06-23T00:45:37+00:00June 23rd, 2011|Uncategorized|Comments Off on Something for Everyone: 'CIGNA Corp. v. Amara'